Well, at least they are going away on Fifth street. I must confess that before I leave the house and drift towards town, I say a prayer to the great white father that I encounter no bikes in town. The streets are so screwed up with lines going here and there and bikes going both ways on one way streets and cars parked in the middle of the street that it is almost impossible to get from point A to point B without killing someone. I waited for a car to go the other day after the light had changed and I finally figured out that I was parked. And no where did I see a bicycle. At no time in the last 3 years of becoming a cyclist friendly city have I even seen a bike in the lanes designed for them. Oh, I have seen them on the sidewalk and I have seen them dart across traffic to get to the sidewalk on the other side of the street, but at no time have I seen a cyclist with their little helmets riding in the bike lanes. Those people are rarer then the Dodo bird which was declared extinct many, many years ago. And do you want to know why? I will tell you.
Many moons ago when I was a mere child I learned to ride a bike. And I learned to ride a bike in traffic. I did not learn to ride on the sidewalk because that was designed for people to walk on, hence the term side walk meant walk on the side. Side walk. Not side ride. It was a very simple concept. If I was riding on the right side of the road the same as a car was driving on the right side of the road I was assured if a car wanted to pass me, the car could speed up and zip out around me. Anything on wheels follows this rule. When walking I walk on the left facing traffic. I can step off the road that way and avoid getting ran over. Simple concept. Walk facing traffic and when driving or riding go with the flow.
In this manner I have survived 74 years without a scratch. It is my opinion that it would have been much simpler and a whole lot cheaper to require a license on a bike and require the owner to pass a test. Motorcyclists have to and the only difference there is that the motorcycle has a motor and the bike does not.
I understand that their are places where bikes are a major means of transportation and I think had the city fathers just studied how it was done that a lot of frustrations could have been avoided and the city would have saved a lot of money on paint. My theory on this is that it was not broken so why did they have to fix it?
Many moons ago when I was a mere child I learned to ride a bike. And I learned to ride a bike in traffic. I did not learn to ride on the sidewalk because that was designed for people to walk on, hence the term side walk meant walk on the side. Side walk. Not side ride. It was a very simple concept. If I was riding on the right side of the road the same as a car was driving on the right side of the road I was assured if a car wanted to pass me, the car could speed up and zip out around me. Anything on wheels follows this rule. When walking I walk on the left facing traffic. I can step off the road that way and avoid getting ran over. Simple concept. Walk facing traffic and when driving or riding go with the flow.
In this manner I have survived 74 years without a scratch. It is my opinion that it would have been much simpler and a whole lot cheaper to require a license on a bike and require the owner to pass a test. Motorcyclists have to and the only difference there is that the motorcycle has a motor and the bike does not.
I understand that their are places where bikes are a major means of transportation and I think had the city fathers just studied how it was done that a lot of frustrations could have been avoided and the city would have saved a lot of money on paint. My theory on this is that it was not broken so why did they have to fix it?
No comments:
Post a Comment